한국과학사학회지, 제42권 제3호 (2020), 549-587

연려실기술 “천문전고” ‘첨성’ 조에 대한 사료 비판

by 안상현
Atachment
첨부파일 '1'
Extra Form
초록 We have performed philological analyses and source criticism on the section of astronomical observations in the astronomical treatise in Yeolryosilgisul. The section contains four paragraphs as follows. The first paragraph describes the establishment of the royal astronomical bureau, the construction of an observational station, and the recruits of astronomers. The second paragraph describes an episode where King Sejong regarded the earthquake and comet as portents from the Heaven and while he himself observed the comet as careful responses, he understood the efforts of the astronomers to appoint them as provincial governors of the provinces near to Seoul. The third paragraph states that King Sejong sent them to Ming China to get information on the calendar-making methods and astronomical instruments. The fourth paragraph describes a fact that astronomers were dispatched to the southern and northern ends of the territory to observe the star Canopus. However, our analyses demonstrate that these paragraphs do not agree with historical facts when being compared with authentic historical sources such as the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty. Hence, we conclude that it may be improper to adopt these statements as historical facts, so that we propose to verify previous historical descriptions made by adopting the statements.
주요어 Yeolryosilgisul, astronomical treatise, philological analyses, source criticism, history of astronomy
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

ESC닫기

+ - Up Down Comment Print

첨부파일 확인하시기 바랍니다.


Designed by sketchbooks.co.kr / sketchbook5 board skin

나눔글꼴 설치 안내


이 PC에는 나눔글꼴이 설치되어 있지 않습니다.

이 사이트를 나눔글꼴로 보기 위해서는
나눔글꼴을 설치해야 합니다.

설치 취소

Sketchbook5, 스케치북5

Sketchbook5, 스케치북5

Sketchbook5, 스케치북5

Sketchbook5, 스케치북5