Skip to content
한국과학사학회지, 제40권 제2호 (2018), 347-350

[Book Review] Hong, Sung-Joo and Wi-Chin Song 홍성주·송위진, Hyeondae hangugui gwahak gisul jeongchaek: Chugyeogui seonggong’gwa talchugyeok silheom 현대 한국의 과학기술정책: 추격의 성공과 탈추격 실험. Paju: Deulnyeok, 2017. 336 pp.

by KANG Yeonsil
Atachment
첨부파일 '1'
Extra Form

Hong, Sung-Joo and Wi-Chin Song 홍성주·송위진, Hyeondae hangugui gwahak gisul jeongchaek: Chugyeogui seonggong’gwa talchugyeok silheom 현대 한국의 과학기술정책: 추격의 성공과 탈추격 실험 (South Korea’s Science and Technology Policies: The Shaping of Catch-up System and Its Transformation for a Post-Catch-Up Era). Paju: Deulnyeok, 2017. 336 pp.


KANG Yeonsil 


What is the driving force that made possible and sustained Korea’s economic development?” (preface). The case of Korea, which went from being a poor, war-ravaged country to an industrialized one with substantial technological capabilities, has received much attention from scholars and policymakers around the world. In this well-researched book, Sung-Joo Hong and Wi-Chin Song answer this question by looking into the 60-year history of Korea’s science and technology policy.

This book adopts a widely used periodization. The catch-up era, following the Korean War to the early 1990s, is the period when national policies focused on following the paths of technological development that are experienced by developed countries. In the post-catch-up era, from the late 1990s to the present, South Korea has navigated own path for innovation. The authors see science and technology policy in these two eras as being fundamentally different and thus so, too, are their analytical approaches. The catch-up era is written by Hong and uses historical analysis whereas Song handles the more recent period, which is approached from the perspective of innovation studies. While the two parts are somewhat independent, together they convincingly illustrate how science and technology policies have evolved over time in response to domestic and international circumstances as well as how legacies of the catch-up era continue.

The authors argue that government-led policies during the catch-up era were an unprecedented success while post-catch-up science and technology policy is still at an experimental stage. In so arguing, this book emphasizes two things. First, the success of the catch-up period deserves to be properly evaluated. They directly express their concern on the recent propensity to evaluate the catch-up era in the late twentieth century “as if it were easy” or “the past to be buried.” By closely examining how policy choices were made under what historical circumstances, they claim that the hard-earned successes of the catch-up period can be better understood. Part one is devoted to catch-up science and technology policy from the late 1950s to the early 1990s. Based on a meticulous analysis of archival sources, this part demonstrates how the “internalization of science and technology” was achieved and how science and technology became a part of a national system. The author pays attention to blueprints for science and technology development, technology importation strategies, human resources development, and the building of a national research system, showing the government’s leading and overarching role in developing technological capacity throughout the catch-up period.

Understanding Korea’s catch-up is also beneficial as a guide to developing countries interested in learning lessons from Korea’s success. Part one, in particular, provides the key ingredients of the recipe for success. For instance, Hong stresses that maintaining a nationalistic approach in receiving official development aid and importing technology was important. According to the author, the nationalistic view toward science and technology dates back to the post-colonial period when scientists believed science and technology should be foundational to the nation building. In the 1960s when the Korean government was dependent on foreign aid, nationalism enabled the internalization of technology, rather than depending on foreign personnel. This was further reinforced later, as science and technology policy was aligned with the national goal of industrial development and economic growth. Positioned as a means to achieve that larger goal, science and technology were justified in receiving strong support from political leaders. In other words, the government built, set goals, and created roles for researchers as a part of the public sector, as opposed to researchers creating their own destiny during this period.

Second, the key elements of “success in catching-up” have become major obstacles to the “post-catch-up experiment.” The authors stress that the repercussions of catch-up policies have been preventing Korea’s science and technology—innovation systems, policies, governing structures, research and development—from strengthening their innovative and creative capacities. At the end of the part one, Hong particularly draws the reader’s attention to a hierarchical and dependent relationship between the leading role played by the government and the passive role of the research and development community. She points out that this successful catch-up strategy has become a significant liability since the 2000s because the bureaucratic dynamics of the government leave little room to explore new paths of innovation. Thus, although this book begins making a distinction between two periods (catch-up and post-catch-up) in the history of Korea’s science and technology policy, it actually ends up illuminating how that distinction remains unclear.

The path dependency of catch-up strategies is an overarching theme of part two, which examines “post-catch-up experiments” in three major sectors: industry, government, and civil society. Since the late 1990s, imitating known technological trajectories has turned out to be less effective. That attributes to both internal and external reasons; as catching up had succeeded, there were fewer areas of technology for catching up and developing countries became much more sensitive to technology transfer. Thus, post-catch-up strategy requires “creative innovation pioneering a new technological trajectory” rather than imitation and solving the “open question of building one’s own technology and systems without any orientation” (155-156).

The key argument of the part two, however, is that a system of catch-up continues to influence thinking and policymaking regardless of the changing circumstances. For instance, “selection and concentration,” or targeting strategy was an efficient and effective resource allocation policy in the catch-up era. But it inhibits Korea from moving towards post-catch-up innovation by strengthening large corporate-centered innovation systems, competition over resources, political influence over science and technology policy, and the hype surrounding new and emerging technologies. In part two, Song contends that system innovation is needed. Rather than focusing on technological innovations, what necessary is to change the “system and context of technological innovation” by developing new ways of defining problems, making decisions, and governing science and technology (261).

While the two authors analyze different time periods and use different analytical approaches, they share a macroscopic view. They each focus on scientific and technological institutions, such as governmental policies, administrations, organizations, research, industry, and civil society. In that sense, the two authors inherit the two influential schools of studying science and technology policy in Korea. First, historians have paid attention to the creation, changes, and influences of important scientific organizations or programs. Second, scholars of management, economics, and public administration have focused to innovation systems and innovation policy, asking how to foster innovation capacity of an industry, city, or nation. By taking a macroscopic view, the authors do not tell the implementation side of the story. For instance, this book does not provide readers with insight on how the policies made by high-ranking figures in government and industry were responded to and delivered by scientists and engineers in the field. In that sense, this book could be complemented by, for instance, Kyonghee Han and Gary Lee Downey’s Engineers for Korea (2014), which discusses how “techno-national images,” or nation-wide imaginations and aspirations for development, were co-created and shared by engineers.

Similarly, the authors put innovation at the center of narrating the history of science and technology policy. In other words, Linsu Kim’s pioneering study explaining Korea’s technology development strategy as “from imitation to innovation” forms the backbone of this work. Increasingly, however, historians of technology are taking a non-innovation-centric view, for instance, by discussing how technology importing countries redefine and reinvent the use of such technologies. Hyungsub Choi’s recently published article on the history of the power tiller is an example of one such study. His article provides a telling case of local adaptations, as well as the social changes brought by, and the political ideals instilled in, the technology.

Overall this is a very welcome book on Korea’s science and technology policy. While there are understandable limitations as to why such considerations may not have been included in the book, this book nonetheless provides readers with a better understanding of Korea’s history of science and technology policy. With careful analysis, the two authors provide insights for researchers and students in the relevant fields, including the history of science and technology, development studies, and innovation studies, as well as modern Korean history. Some chapters of this book will trigger good classroom discussions in both undergraduate and graduate classes. More broadly, this book will be of value to scientists, engineers, and policymakers concerned about policy issues, as well as those overseas, especially in developing countries, who wish to learn from Korea’s experience. An in-depth analysis provides readers with a deeper understanding of the historically rooted, structural characteristics of Korea’s science and technology policy. The authors’ abundant experience in policy research and policy advising makes this book not just academically significant but also invaluable for future science and technology policymaking.


Category
List of Articles
분류 제목
제40권 제1호 [연구논문] 함포(艦砲)의 배치를 중심으로 본 이순신 거북선의 구조 연구 (A Study on the Yi Sunsin Turtle Ship Structure Focusing on the Deployment of Naval Guns) file
채연석 (CHAE Yeon Seok)
2018 1-27
제40권 제1호 [연구논문] 아랍에서 조선까지 이슬람 역법의 전래와 수용 (Transmission and Assimilation of the Islamic Calendrical Astronomy, from Arab to Joseon Korea) file
이은희(LEE Eun-Hee), 한영호(HAHN Young-Ho), 강민정(KANG Min-Jeong)
2018 29-58
제40권 제1호 [연구논문] 발전된 과학 공간으로의 이동을 통한 연구자 되기: 바이러스 학자 이호왕의 사례를 중심으로 (Establishment of Academic Capabilities Through the Movement to Advanced Study Spaces: Focusing on the Learning Process of Ho Wang Lee) file
신미영 (SHIN Miyoung)
2018 59-89
제40권 제1호 [비평논문] 한국의 기술 발전에 관한 연구사적 검토와 제언 (Studies on Technological Development in South Korea: A Review and Suggestion) file
송성수 (SONG Sungsoo)
2018 91-113
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 전상운 선생님을 추모하며 file
이면우
2018 115-118
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 오호라 전상운 형 file
송상용
2018 119-125
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 전상운(全相運) 선생을 추모하며 … file
박성래
2018 127-133
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 전상운 선생님을 추모함 file
김영식
2018 135-137
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 추도사 file
고경신
2018 139-141
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 전상운 선생님에 대한 추억 file
임정혁
2018 143-148
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 이제 어디 가서 길을 묻고, 가르침을 받을 것인가 file
조정미
2018 149-151
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 전상운의 한국 과학사 초기 연구(1959-1974): 두 명의 스승과 한 명의 친구 file
신동원
2018 153-157
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 한국 과학의 정체성을 찾아서 : 1960-1970년대 전상운 선생의 한국 과학기술사 서술 file
임종태
2018 159-173
제40권 제1호 [특집: 고 전상운 전 회장(1932-2018) 추모] 학술 여행 동반기: 전상운 회장을 추념하며 file
남문현
2018 175-200
제40권 제1호 [서평] 김연희, 『한국 근대과학 형성사 (한국의 과학과 문명 006)』 (들녘, 2016), 408쪽 file
미야가와 타쿠야
2018 201-204
제40권 제1호 학회소식, 회칙, 연구윤리, 논문상, 편집규정, 투고규정 file
한국과학사학회지(KJHS)
2018 205-235
제40권 제2호 [Research Paper] Enlightenment Chemistry as an 'Experimental Science' file
Mi Gyung KIM
2018 237-264
제40권 제2호 [Special Issue] Science and Technology in Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines file
MOON Manyong
2018 265-274
제40권 제2호 [Special Issue] The Overseas Fellowship Program: A Technoscientific Scholarship Program in New Order Indonesia file
Anto MOHSIN
2018 275-304
제40권 제2호 [Special Issue] Hybrid Origins of a Modern Vietnamese Science and Technology System: An Introduction to Contemporary History of Science and Technology in Vietnam file
THAI Vinh and MOON Manyong
2018 305-326
제40권 제2호 [Special Issue] Promoting Science for the Modern Archipelago: Science in the Twentieth Century Philippines file
JEONG Se-Kwon
2018 327-344
제40권 제2호 [Book Review] Laura Micheletti Puaca, Searching for Scientific Womanpower: Technocratic Feminism and the Politics of National Security, 1940–1980. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2014. 261 pp. file
LEEM So Yeon
2018 345-346
제40권 제2호 [Book Review] Hong, Sung-Joo and Wi-Chin Song 홍성주·송위진, Hyeondae hangugui gwahak gisul jeongchaek: Chugyeogui seonggong’gwa talchugyeok silheom 현대 한국의 과학기술정책: 추격의 성공과 탈추격 실험. Paju: Deulnyeok, 2017. 336 pp. file
KANG Yeonsil
2018 347-350
제40권 제2호 [Book Review] Moon, Joong-Yang 문중양, Joeson hugi gwahak sasangsa: Seogu ujuron-gwa Joseon cheonjigwan-ui mannam 조선 후기 과학 사상사: 서구 우주론과 조선 천지관의 만남. Paju: Deulnyeok, 2016. 432 pp. file
JEONG Myung-Hyun
2018 351-354
제40권 제2호 Guidelines for Manuscripts Written in English file
제40권 제3호 [연구논문] 해방 전후 수학 지식의 보급과 탈식민지 수학자의 역할: 최윤식(崔允植)과 이임학(李林學)의 사례를 중심으로 file
노상호
2018 359-388
제40권 제3호 [연구논문] 협상 테이블 위에 놓인 개발 계획서: 제2차 전원(電源) 개발 계획 수립 과정을 중심으로 file
오선실
2018 389-417
제40권 제3호 [기획] 북한 사회주의 체제 형성기의 보건 의료사, 1955-1961, 서문 file
김옥주, 정준호
2018 419-424
제40권 제3호 [기획] 붉은 보건 전사 만들기: 북한 보건 의료 부문의 사상 투쟁, 1956-1961 file
정준호, 김민규, 김옥주
2018 425-478
제40권 제3호 [기획] 북한 천리마 운동과 보건 의료 인력의 동원, 1956-1961 file
고요한, 김옥주, 정준호
2018 479-499
제40권 제3호 [기획] 사회주의적 생활 양식으로서의 위생: 1950년대 후반 북한에서의 위생 문화 사업을 통한 대중 개조 file
윤연하, 김옥주, 정준호
2018 501-525
제40권 제3호 [기획] 생태계의 사회주의적 개조: 북한의 폐흡충 박멸 사업, 1955-1961 file
곽희환, 김옥주, 정준호
2018 527-550
제40권 제3호 [연구노트] 『조선식물향명집』 "사정 요지"를 통해 본 식물명의 유래 file
조민제, 이웅, 최성호
2018 551-608
제40권 제3호 [서평] 전용훈, 『한국천문학사』 (들녘, 2017), 477쪽. file
경석현
2018 609-616
제40권 제3호 [서평] Grace Yen Shen, Unearthing the Nation: Modern Geology and Nationalism in Republican China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014. 309 pp. file
김주희
2018 617-623
제40권 제3호 [서평] Sigrid Schmalzer, Red Revolution, Green Revolution, Scientific Farming in Socialist China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016. 304 pp. file
정원교
2018 625-632
Board Pagination ‹ Prev 1 Next ›
/ 1

Designed by sketchbooks.co.kr / sketchbook5 board skin

나눔글꼴 설치 안내


이 PC에는 나눔글꼴이 설치되어 있지 않습니다.

이 사이트를 나눔글꼴로 보기 위해서는
나눔글꼴을 설치해야 합니다.

설치 취소

Sketchbook5, 스케치북5

Sketchbook5, 스케치북5

Sketchbook5, 스케치북5

Sketchbook5, 스케치북5

Phone +82-2-3703-9341 / Email khssociety@gmail.com
© The Korean History of Science Society 2014

Powered by Xpress Engine / Designed by Sketchbook

sketchbook5, 스케치북5

sketchbook5, 스케치북5

나눔글꼴 설치 안내


이 PC에는 나눔글꼴이 설치되어 있지 않습니다.

이 사이트를 나눔글꼴로 보기 위해서는
나눔글꼴을 설치해야 합니다.

설치 취소